The Old Original Name of February
Though February is
the shortest month of the year, it often feels like the longest in cold, snowy
climates. Why does the month have only 28 days?
First here’s a
little history of your calendar. The original Roman calendar only had ten
months, because the winter was not demarcated. In the 700s BC, the second king
of Rome Numa Pompilius added January and February to the end of
the calendar in order to conform to how long it actually takes the Earth to go
around the Sun. The two new months were both originally 28 days long. It is
lost to history why January acquired more days, though there are various
unverifiable hypotheses. At that time, March 1 became New Years’ Day. Later, in
153 BC, the beginning of the year was moved to January 1.
The word February comes from the Roman festival of
purification called Februa where people were ritually washed.
There is a Roman god called Februus,
but he is named after the festival, not the other way around. Other months,
like January, are named after Roman gods. (Curious about the duplicity of
January?
The interesting
linguistic story, though, lies in England. Before we adopted the Latin name for
the second month, Old English used much more vibrant names to describe it. The
most common Old English name was Solmonath, which literally means “mud month.” It
is pretty clear what they were describing. A lesser-used term was Kale-monath, which meant
“cabbage month.” We can imagine that the English were eating a lot of cabbage
in February in the 1100s.
Ever wondered what the heck the “ides” of
March were?
What do you think of February?
No comments:
Post a Comment